root
Differences
This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
Both sides previous revisionPrevious revisionNext revision | Previous revision | ||
root [2023/04/07 10:31] – [Notes about annotation] pm | root [2023/05/17 11:28] (current) – pm | ||
---|---|---|---|
Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
Still, we tried to capture what we believe is the common core of all the related verbs. The material in the cell ‘Root’ therefore refers to the verb without prefixes, thematic vowels or verbal affixes. | Still, we tried to capture what we believe is the common core of all the related verbs. The material in the cell ‘Root’ therefore refers to the verb without prefixes, thematic vowels or verbal affixes. | ||
+ | |||
+ | Note that verbs that display suppletion between the perfective and imperfective form are annotated as having different roots. In cases where the suppletive form is related to another existing verb (//oditi// ‘to go away.pfv’, | ||
^ Language ^ Example | ^ Language ^ Example | ||
Line 94: | Line 96: | ||
| BCS | obelodaniti | bel+o+dan |‘to disclose.pfv’| | | BCS | obelodaniti | bel+o+dan |‘to disclose.pfv’| | ||
- | **Colon** | + | **Colon**\\ |
In the BCMS Database, the colon mark is used in cases where the annotator has the intuition there is a prefix, but the root reconstructed on this analysis does not appear in other words. e.g. //u:zeti// ‘take’, where //zeti// does not appear in any other verb. | In the BCMS Database, the colon mark is used in cases where the annotator has the intuition there is a prefix, but the root reconstructed on this analysis does not appear in other words. e.g. //u:zeti// ‘take’, where //zeti// does not appear in any other verb. | ||
root.1680856296.txt.gz · Last modified: 2023/04/07 10:31 by pm